Buxted Parish Council

Buxted Parish Council came into being in 1894 when the present system of Parish Councils was instituted to give rural communities a voice. Buxted Parish covers some 7,000 acres with an electorate of about 2,500 out of a population of 3,200. It encompasses the villages of Buxted, High Hurstwood and Five Ash Down.

The parish is divided into two wards – Buxted/Five Ash Down (10 councillors) and High Hurstwood (5 councillors). Councils are elected for a term of 4 years. Council meetings are held on the second Tuesday in every month (except August), alternating between Buxted Reading Room, High Hurstwood Village Hall and Five Ash Down Village Hall, at 19.30. Meetings agendas are displayed one week in advance on the Parish notice boards in Buxted (on the Ionides Trust site), High Hurstwood (near The Hurstwood pub) and in Five Ash Down (outside the Village Hall) and on the website. The agenda includes a list of any planning applications received from Wealden District Council for consultation. All meetings of the Council and its committees are open to the public, who are welcome to ask questions or raise issues with the Council before the meetings formally begin.

An early requirement was to provide allotments, which we do. Councils can also support arts and crafts; contribute to maintenance of churchyards; protect commons, provide buildings for public meetings, functions and entertainment, maintain public footpaths and bridleways (jointly with ESCC), provide footway lighting (we don’t), provide and maintain public open spaces, and comment on planning applications.

We also take an active interest in highways matters, policy and our environment (e.g. trees and hedgerows). More and more we have to comment on government policies for local government and voice our electors’ concerns.

Parish assets include Buxted Reading Room, two recreation grounds (Buxted and High Hurstwood), two allotment areas in Buxted (recently re-generated) and High Hurstwood, children’s play areas in Buxted and High Hurstwood, and two bus shelters. The budget is set annually over the period October to December. Planned expenditure less income forms the ‘Parish Precept’ which is levied as part of annual Council Tax. Apart from meeting general running expenses of the council – specifically employing our Parish Clerk – the council makes grants to local organisations and contributes to local projects e.g. Buxted Traffic calming.

The Parish Council recognises the burden of Council Tax but is also conscious of local needs for improvements in the Parish that increasingly are not being covered by either County or District as they seek to keep within national government budgets. Before increasing Precept to cover costs of local improvements such as the recent traffic calming, the Parish Council ensures that such improvements are what our electorate want and are prepared to pay for.

Councillors sit on various committees (e.g. Finance, Planning, Communications) and outside bodies (e.g. Ionides Trust, Buxted Community Hall Trust). Each keeps an eye on different parts of the Parish, e.g. for planning purposes and trees.

Our Parish Clerks, Beccy Macklen & Claudine Feltham (01435 515219) clerk@buxted-pc.gov.uk, who act as the Council’s ‘proper officers’ on the Council’s behalf and under its direction.

Latest Parish News

Wealden District Council - Local Government Reorganisation update

15

September 2025

The projected financial prospects of any newly created unitary councils in East Sussex has prompted Wealden District Council’s lead members to pause their commitment to the One East Sussex Model being developed by East Sussex and district and borough councils, whilst they explore other options available to them.

Councillor James Partridge, Alliance for Wealden (Liberal Democrat) lead councillor for Governance, Waste & Local Economy and leader of the council, said,“The point of reorganising local government would surely be to make savings and improve service delivery for our residents. We have yet to find a proposal which does either of those things and find ourselves struggling to support a business case that would see the new local authority plummet into debt from day one, whilst also being so vast that local services for our residents, especially those in rural areas, are bound to suffer.”

Whilst Wealden has been collaborating with other local authorities across East Sussex in the development of a business case for a county wide merger, it is only recently that the data analysis made clear that this would start from day one with an almost £50million deficit.

Wealden has always supported the development of a One East Sussex Council proposal in light of requests for proposals for local government reorganisation in East Sussex and Brighton, but has also made a clear commitment to remain open to exploring other options and other models, especially if government guidance changed. Initially the government specified guidance that unitary councils should have populations of around 500,000 but has since dropped that requirement and allowed proposals for smaller unitaries to be accepted.

A county-wide survey on local government reorganisation in East Sussex, undertaken earlier this year, showed that whilst almost half of residents in East Sussex thought a single unitary council for East Sussex could provide cost savings; when asked about any concerns about a single unitary council, again almost half of residents were concerned at losing local representation.

A quarter of residents thought a single unitary council for East Sussex covered too big an area. There were also strong concerns about how a large single unitary could retain any sense of local identity and whether it would provide enough local political representation. What came out clearly from all the consultation is that high quality services matter the most – local residents are more concerned about services than about local government structures.

Councillor James Partridge, Alliance for Wealden (Liberal Democrat) lead councillor for Governance, Waste & Local Economy and leader of the council, said,“We have to get the best outcome we can for our residents. We are not saying no to the One East Sussex proposal but we want to be sure that this is the best option available and so we have taken this pause while we see what other models are being developed.

"Wealden deserves services that work, not another costly shake-up. When Wealden District Council agreed to look at options for a single East Sussex unitary, it also left the door open to smaller unitaries across East Sussex. We have always believed that smaller councils likely serve communities better. Unitaries of around 300,000 residents would mean fairer voices and services that can be designed around the different needs of towns, villages and rural areas"

Councillor Rachel Millward, Alliance for Wealden (Green Party) and lead councillor for Community, Culture and Communications and deputy leader of the council, said, “Let’s be clear: reorganisation won’t fix council finances. In fact, it risks being expensive, disruptive and with no obvious gain. When surveyed, residents told us loud and clear that quality of services matters most. That’s why we’re saying, focus on the right geographies for the best services, demand that the Fair Funding Review ends the unfair gap between councils and secure proper solutions for essentials like social care and housing. Communities need councils that can deliver - not another round of musical chairs in local government.”

If a single East Sussex is formed it would become a £1.17 billion business. Taking into account all six councils’ budget forecasts going forward, it is forecast that any new One Sussex authority on 1 April 2028, the date when all councils would come together, would start with an annual deficit of £49m which over the first five years would rise to £61m.